Legal Opinion
Clements v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 9, 1926No. 16295PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
STEPHENSON, 0.
The plaintiff and her husband lived in the town of Belen, N. M„ where he was employed in the railroad shops of the Atchison, Topeka & Sante Fe Railway Company. The public highway, over which the plaintiff’s husband traveled to and from his work in a Ford touring car. ran in an easterly and westerly direction, crossing the main north and south railway line of the defendant about 100 yards west of the plaintiff’s home. There was an irrigation ditch parallel to the railway line, and situated either on or along the railway right of way, which crossed the public highway; an…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Continental Improvement Co. v. SteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GriffithSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Folsom v. Ninety SixSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. RundellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Myers v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Koch v. Southern Pacific CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Resser v. Boise Cascade Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Hopkins v. KurnSupreme Court of Missouri · 1943
- St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.