Legal Opinion

Amanda Lynn Manata v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 1, 2016No. 1D15-1925PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The appellant appeals her convictions for one count of organized scheme to defraud and one count of grand theft, entered after an open plea to the charges. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the appellant’s conviction for organized scheme to defraud, but reverse and remand for the trial court to vacate the appellant’s conviction for grand theft and to resentence the appellant on the organized scheme to defraud conviction.

Convictions for both grand theft and scheme to defraud violate double jeopardy when both “are based on common allegations.” Saddler v. State, 921 So.2d 777 (Fla. 1st…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pizzo v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2006
  2. Jessica Patrice Anucinski v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida · 2014
  3. Gonzalez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
  4. Saddler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Manata v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API