Legal Opinion

State v. Thaxton

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 14, 2011No. A11A0727PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Presiding Judge.

The State appeals from the grant of defendant Randall Thax-ton’s motion for discharge and acquittal for violation of his constitutional right to a speedy trial. See OCGA § 5-7-1 (a) (1) (authorizing the State to appeal, among other things, from the dismissal of an indictment). The State contends that the trial court erred in its analysis of the Barker 1 factors by: (i) failing to weigh heavily against Thaxton his failure to assert his right to a speedy trial before indictment, and (ii) failing to treat as relatively benign the post-arrest, pre-indictment delay at issue…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Dillingham v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  2. Harrison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  3. State v. CurryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  4. SAYANI v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
  5. State v. Marcus Daniel DixonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API