State v. Thaxton
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, Presiding Judge.
The State appeals from the grant of defendant Randall Thax-ton’s motion for discharge and acquittal for violation of his constitutional right to a speedy trial. See OCGA § 5-7-1 (a) (1) (authorizing the State to appeal, among other things, from the dismissal of an indictment). The State contends that the trial court erred in its analysis of the Barker 1 factors by: (i) failing to weigh heavily against Thaxton his failure to assert his right to a speedy trial before indictment, and (ii) failing to treat as relatively benign the post-arrest, pre-indictment delay at issue…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Dillingham v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- Harrison v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- State v. CurryCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
- SAYANI v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2011
- State v. Marcus Daniel DixonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.