Legal Opinion

Hegel v. Hegel

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 5, 1923PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.

The Honorable Donald T. Warner, State Referee, in his report, found “that the sum of $4,000 is a reasonable and proper portion of the defendant’s existing property to be allowed as alimony, and in addition thereto that a payment of $8.50 per week out of the earnings and income of the defendant, so long as the plaintiff remains unmarried, is a reasonable and proper allowance to be made to her, or in lieu of such periodical payments, such gross sum in addition to said $4,000 as the court deems proper.” The defendant’s counsel remonstrated because the award of alimony, as made by the report, was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Olmstead v. OlmsteadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1912

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Steinmann v. SteinmannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
  2. Felton v. FeltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
  3. Heard v. HeardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
  4. Hotkowski v. HotkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  5. Hopewell Baptist Church v. CraigSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API