Gearing v. Gearing
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Keller, J.,
It is a jurisdictional requirement of an action of divorce in Pennsylvania that the libellant shall have resided within this Commonwealth for one year previous to the filing of the petition or libel. The appellee, the libellant in the present action, attempted to comply with .this requirement by proof tending to establish a constructive domicile in the state without any actual residence therein. This is not sufficient. Our decisions hold that the residence contemplated by our statutes relating to divorce is a permanent one with domiciliary intent; a temporary residence…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Michael v. MichaelCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1904
- Tipton v. TiptonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
- Dickinson v. DickinsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
- Reed v. ReedSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
- Hollister v. HollisterSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1847
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Huston v. HustonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
- Alburger v. AlburgerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
- Verbeck v. VerbeckSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
- Gearing v. GearingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Hilyard v. HilyardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.