Legal Opinion
In Re Tenner
California Supreme Court
Decided August 3, 1942No. Crim. 4406Published
1Opinion of the Court
20 Cal.2d 670 (1942)
In re JOSEPH TENNER, on Habeas Corpus.
Crim. No. 4406.
Supreme Court of California. In Bank.
Aug. 3, 1942.
William F. Herron for Petitioner.
Earl Warren, Attorney General, and David K. Lener, Deputy Attorney General for Respondent.
EDMONDS, J.
The question presented for decision by the petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus concerns the constitutionality of the Uniform Act for Out-of-State Parolee Supervision (Stats. 1937, p. 469; Deering's Gen. Laws, 1937, Act 5783.) He is held by the respondent Chief of Police pursuant to the direction of the Board of Prison Terms…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Roberts v. ReillySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Commonwealth of Ky. v. DENNISON, GOVERNOR, &C.Supreme Court of the United States · 1861
- Hyatt v. People Ex Rel. CorkranSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. MaySupreme Court of the United States · 1904
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.