Legal Opinion
Mabel R. v. Rayshawn D.
New York City Family Court
Decided October 26, 2011PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
*1024OPINION OF THE COURT
John M. Hunt, J.
Respondent has moved for dismissal of this family offense proceeding upon the ground that the Family Court lacks subject matter jurisdiction in this case (CPLR 3211 [a] [2]). Respondent has also moved for dismissal of the petition on the ground that it fails to state a cause of action in accordance with Civil Practice Law and Rules § 3211 (a) (7).
By petition filed pursuant to Family Court Act § 821 on August 2, 2011 the petitioner, Mabel R., alleges that Rayshawn D. is her grandson, and that
“I suffered a stroke [in] February 2009. After that time my health…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Leon v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Henderson v. ShinsekiSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Goshen v. Mutual Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Huggins v. RandolphCivil Court of the City of New York · 2014