Legal Opinion

Frenchak v. Sunbeam Coal Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 19, 1985No. 01440PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

This appeal is from judgment on the pleadings in an action to quiet title. Appellant contends that the instant coal lease is no longer in effect. We agree and, accordingly, reverse.

The lease provision in question provides that:

This lease shall continue for a period of five (5) years from the effective date hereof or until all of the coal which the coal operator determines can be mined, removed and sold with economy and profit has been or so long as minimum advance royalties are being tendered by the Coal Operator.

The court below interpreted this clause to mean that appellee…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Aye v. Philadelphia Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1899
  2. Killebrew v. MurrayCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  3. Weatherly v. American Agricultural Chemical Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1933
  4. Lehigh & Wilkes-Barre Coal Co. v. WrightSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
  5. Davis v. City of Phila., TrusteeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hutchison v. Sunbeam Coal Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Meyer v. Cuna Mutual Insurance SocietyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
  3. Clearfield Volunteer Fire Department v. BP Oil, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Commonwealth v. LisboySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Needleman v. Liberty Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API