Legal Opinion

Burgin v. . Dougherty

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 11, 1929Published

1Per curiam

This is a proceeding for tbe partition of real estate. Tbe plaintiff alleges, and it is not denied, tbat Spencer Burgin was tbe owner in fee of tbe land in controversy. He died leaving surviving him bis widow, Jane Burgin, who has a dower interest in tbe land, and tbe plaintiff and bis (Spencer’s) daughter, Mary Burgin Dougherty. On 10 June, 1920, Mary Burgin Dougherty and her husband, George Dougherty, tbe appellant, legally adopted tbe defendant Eobert Franklin Coleman as their child and heir at law. Mary Burgin Dougherty died leaving no child of her own, and it is alleged tbat Eobert…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Erwin v. . BaileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1898
  2. Turner v. . BattleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918
  3. Jelser v. . WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Ashe v. PettifordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API