Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Appleman

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 9, 1875PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from the Court of Common Pleas. The tacts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the Court. The verdict and judgment were for the plaintiffs, and the defendants appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBartol, C. J.

This is a suit upon a promissory note against the appellants as endorsers. It was originally instituted by Alpheus V. Appleman alone; afterwards'by an amendment his co-partner Asbury G. Appleman, the other appellee, was joined as co-plaintiff. The effect of the amendment was to deprive the defendants of the benefit of their plea of set-off, which they claimed against. Alpheus v. Appleman; but could not be availed of against the joint demand of the firm. No question arises under the plea of set-off. The note was drawn by M. D. Savin and C. E. Abbott, dated Sept. 20th, 1871, for $340, payable…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wynn v. AldenNew York Supreme Court · 1847
  2. Farmers & Mechanics Bank v. AllenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1862
  3. Wetherall v. ClaggettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1868
  4. Digges's Lessee v. BealeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1726

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bob Holding Corp. v. Normal Realty Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API