Legal Opinion

Judd v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 14, 2003No. 48075-8-IPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.

The legislature created a statutory scheme for the regulation of alternate operator service companies. It included a cause of action against providers of telecommunications services for violation of the Consumer Protection Act to assure appropriate disclosure of telephone rates. However, the legislature did so only for violations of the regulations promulgated by the Washington Utilities and Transportation Commission. Further, the legislature preempted any direct action against the phone companies. The decision of the trial court is affirmed.

FACTS

Sandy Judd, Tara Herivel, and Zuraya Wright,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Department of the Army v. Blue Fox, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Bravo v. Dolsen CompaniesWashington Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Goodman v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  4. Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Department of EcologyWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Rios v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Judd v. American Tel. and Tel. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Judd v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Garrison First Family Ltd. Partnership v. Department of HealthCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  4. Point Allen Service Area v. WASH. STATE DOHCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2005
  5. Judd v. Am. Tel. & Tel. Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API