Legal Opinion

Gale v. Birmingham

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 2, 1896No. Nos. 10,092-(110)PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal by defendants from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Kelly, J., granting a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtCanty, J.

This is an action on a promissory note, and the defense is usury. The plaintiff claims to be an innocent purchaser, for value, before maturity, in the usual course of business. Defendants had a verdict, the court granted a new trial, and they appeal. One of the grounds of the motion for a new trial is error at law occurring on the trial. '

To dispose of the case, it is only necessary to consider the one question which the court below considered in its memorandum attached to the order granting a new trial. The court charged the jury as follows: “I charge you that, to prove the character of a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Merchants' National Bank v. McNeirSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. Merchants National Bank v. SullivanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. BuschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  2. First National Bank v. AndersenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  3. Park v. WinsorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  4. Collins v. McDowellSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  5. Robbins v. Swinburne Printing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API