Legal Opinion

Stephenson v. Cavendish

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1950No. 10257PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lovins, President:

This is an original proceeding in mandamus instituted by Liza Jane Stephenson, Mary Stephenson, Mavis Cal-lison Stratton, Howard Dunford, Herbert Dunford, Jake Dunford, Earl • Dunford, Locie Dunford Fowler, Robert Stephenson, Reese Stephenson, Jess Stephenson, Fonda Stephenson Moore, Della Stephenson Lanham, and Myrtle' Stephenson Roberts, hereinafter designated as “petitioners”, against Ray Cavendish, State Road Commissioner of West Virginia, hereinafter referred to as “respondent”. The purpose of this proceeding is to compel respondent to institute a proceeding in eminent…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hardy v. SimpsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Bank of Weston v. ThomasWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Mettler v. MillerIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Childers v. State Road CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Tomlinson v. NickellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1884

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Rosier v. Garron, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Taylor v. State Compensation CommissionerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Stamper Ex Rel. Stamper v. Kanawha County Board of EducationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State Ex Rel. Dunn v. GriffithWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Young v. LewisWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1953

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API