Legal Opinion

Raquette Falls Land Co. v. Hoyt

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1905PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal by. the defendants, Albert Hoyt and others (doing busimess under the name of “The Carthage Lumber Company”), from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county óf, Herkimér on the l'Tth day of September, 1904, Upon the report of a referee.

1Opinion of the Court

Nash, J.:

This action is in trespass, brought to recover the value of timber cut. and removed by' the defendants from 343. acres oil lot No. 4 and 275 acres on lot Ho. 19, Watson's East Triangle,. Herkimer county, which lands were wild and unoccupied. Each party claims title to the lots- under separate tax sales, but the source of title as to'each lot being different' it is necessary to consider the question of title as to each separately.

The source of title of the respondent to lot 4 is a grant by letters patent from the People of the - State to the- Sacketts Harbor and Saratoga Railroad…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McGee v. MathisSupreme Court of the United States · 1866
  2. Wells v. . JohnstonNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
  3. Asylum v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  4. Wells v. JohnstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  5. Raquette Falls Land Co. v. International Paper Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pickell v. City of UticaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API