Legal Opinion

Gidley v. Gladden

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided January 21, 1965No. Civ. No. 63-333PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EAST, District Judge.

The petitioner (Gidley) is in the custody of the respondent (Warden) pursuant to a judgment of sentence entered by the Circuit Court of the State of Oregon.*478for Linn County on September 8, 1961, being a resentence upon a judgment of conviction entered on May 5, 1958.

This Court, in its memorandum of decision entered in these 28 U.S.C. § 2241 habeas proceedings on November 4, 1963, found that judgment of conviction and sentence void, and ordered the State of Oregon to give Gidley a new trial or release him from custody.

The Warden appealed, and the United States Court of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Townsend v. SainSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Charles Blair v. The People of the State of California, Robert A. Heinze, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
  3. Clarence T. Gladden, Warden, Oregon State Penitentiary v. James W. S. GidleyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
  4. State v. GidleyOregon Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In RE SCRUGGS v. RhayWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  2. In RE SCRUGGS v. RhayWashington Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API