Legal Opinion

United States v. Leigh

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided June 5, 1916No. Nos. 1672 and 1674PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstracts 38981 and 39308.

1Opinion of the CourtMartin, Judge

The merchandise in this caséis called “Dronsfield’s patent traverse wheel grinder” and was imported under the tariff act of 1913.

The collector classified the grinder- as a manufacture of metal not specially provided for and accordingly assessed duty thereon at the rate of 20 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 167 of the act.

The importers protested against the assessment, claiming duty upon the article at the rate of 15 per cent ad valorem as a “machine tool”' under paragraph 165.

The protest was sustained upon evidence by the Board of General Appraisers, from which decision the Government now…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Norma Co. of America v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Stone & Downer Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
  2. Cengar U. S., Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  3. Consolidated International Equipment & Supply Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API