Legal Opinion

Amell v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 19, 1977No. 76-1294PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Appellant is appealing from the trial court’s order denying him relief pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850.

Appellant was convicted of two counts of robbery. His conviction was appealed and affirmed. Amell v. State, 319 So.2d 621 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975). A motion for relief pursuant to Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.850 was filed in the trial court and denied.

Appellant contends in this appeal that the trial court erred in denying the motion for such relief. We find the contention to be without merit.

We have carefully examined the record on appeal and considered the briefs, and have concluded that appellant has not…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Peterson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  2. Clements v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  3. Suarez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  4. Amell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Claughton v. ClaughtonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API