Legal Opinion

Parker v. Pace & Davis

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided May 6, 1935No. 4-3853PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtMehaffy, J.

This suit was begun by appellees in the Pulaski Circuit Court asking a writ of mandamus against the appellants. Appellants filed their response, and the case was tried on the following* agreed statement of facts: “It is agreed that: In the fall of the year of 1930 the firm of Pace & Davis, attorneys, composed of Prank Pace and Wallace Davis, of Little Rock, Arkansas, was employed by the Arkansas State Highway Commission as the attorneys of said Commission to represent it in certain litigation then pending or contemplated, among which was the case of Lahar Bros. v. Arkansas State Highway…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  2. Spiegler v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Heinz v. National Bank of CommerceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
  4. City of Chicago v. KlueverIllinois Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Emberson v. Adams CountyNebraska Supreme Court · 1913

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kirby v. NolteSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API