Legal Opinion

Eyak River Packing Co. v. Parks

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1928No. 21079. Department OnePublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff packing company sought, in the superior court for King county, recovery of damages against the defendants, Huglen, Boryer, Parks and Sea Poods Company, alleged to have been suffered as the result of a conspiracy on the part of the defendants and their acts in pursuance thereof, to the injury of the packing company’s fish and fish canning business. The case proceeded to trial in the superior court, sitting with a jury, and resulted in a verdict ¿warding to the packing company recovery against all of the defendants in the sum of $17,500. Thereafter the superior court rendered…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Morehouse v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Eyak River Packing Co. v. HuglenWashington Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Kincaid v. Walla Walla Valley Traction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Cannon v. Seattle Title Trust Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Buell v. Park Auto Transportation Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tucker v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Buob v. Feenaughty MacHinery Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. Fleming v. BuerkliWashington Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API