Legal Opinion
Percell Tarboro v. Reading Company and E. W. Coslett & Sons, Inc
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 19, 1968No. 16413PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
KALODNER, Circuit Judge.
The District Court entered Judgment in favor of the defendants after granting their motions for a directed verdict 1 in the plaintiff’s personal injury action under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act 2 and this appeal followed.
Plaintiff, at the time of his injury on July 2, 1962, was employed as a coal shoveler by the defendant E. W. Coslett & Sons (“Coslett”), a freight handler and forwarder, then engaged in unloading coal hopper ears at a pier owned by the defendant Reading Company (“Reading”), pursuant to an existing contract.
Reading’s motion…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Baker v. Texas & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Ward v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Louis R. Del Vecchio, Jr. v. The Pennsylvania Railroad CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
3Cited by22 opinions
- Mrs. Billie B. McCLURE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. the SALVATION ARMY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Kelley v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Williamson v. Consolidated Rail Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- Mary M. MARES, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. John O. MARSH, Secretary of the Army, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- George N. Vanterpool, Marjorie Vanterpool, His Wife v. Hess Oil V.I. Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.