Legal Opinion

(PS) Tafari v. Brennan

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 5, 2019No. 2:17-cv-00113Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAS HEZEKIAH TAFARI, No. 2:17-cv-00113-MCE-EFB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 MEGAN J. BRENNAN, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Ras Hezekiah Tafari (“Plaintiff”) seeks reconsideration of the Magistrate 18 Judge’s order, ECF No. 86, denying his Motion to Exclude Defendant Megan Brennan’s 19 (“Defendant”) undisclosed witnesses and additional documents under Federal Rule of 20 Civil Procedure 37(c), ECF No. 76.1 For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s Motion, 21 ECF No. 94, is DENIED. 22 In reviewing a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Phoenix Engineering and Supply Inc. v. Universal Electric Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
  2. Concrete Pipe & Products of Cal., Inc. v. Construction Laborers Pension Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API