Process Gas Consumers Group v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge TATEL.
TATEL, Circuit Judge:
Petitioners’ challenge the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s approval of Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company’s proposed method for awarding pipeline capacity and allocating meter amendments. Finding that the Commission engaged in reasoned decision making with respect to both issues, we affirm.
I
The Natural Gas Act (“NGA”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 717, et seq., requires that natural gas companies charge “just and reasonable” rates for the transportation and sale of natural gas. Id. § 717c(a). To promote compliance with this mandate,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United Distribution Companies v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Windward Energy & Marketing Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1996
- Interstate Natural Gas Ass'n of America v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Texaco Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
3Cited by15 opinions
- Florida Municipal Power Agency v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC v. Gail Brandon CochranCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2018
- NEW LIFE EVANGELISTIC CENTER, INC. v. SebeliusDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Bean Dredging, LLC v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Entergy Services, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.