Legal Opinion

St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Standard Paving Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 11, 1924No. 14675PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from Corporation Commission. Action by Stan lard Paving Company against St. Loi|is-San Franciscjo Railway Company, before the Corporation Commission, wherein the State was a party. From an order fixing rates and compelling reparation, the railway company appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ESTES, C.

Complaint was filed before the Corporation Commission by the Standard Paving Company against the St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Company, upon the heax-ing of Which, an order was made requiring plaintiff in error to refund alleged excess of one cent per hundred charged by it and paid toy defendant in error on carriage of 200 cars of crushed stone. Parties will be thus referred to as plaintiff and defendant. Plaintiff operated a rock crusher at Gray, 6.1 miles west of Tulsa, on one line of defendant’s road, from which said rock had been shipped to Red Fork, about six miles south…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. St. Louis-S. F. R. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Atchison, T. & S. F. R. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Marble Savings Bank v. First State Bank of VanossSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  2. St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API