Legal Opinion

Cole v. Grant

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 31, 1919No. 23449PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Certified from Court of Appeal, Second Circuit. Action by A. C. Cole against T. A. Grant, Sheriff. From judgment for defendant, plaintiff appealed to the Court of Appeal, which certified a question.

1Opinion of the CourtSommerville, J.

Our brothers of the Court of Appeal have certified the following question to be answered: Is a car repairer a laborer, whose wages are exempted from seizure by the sheriff, by the terms of article *9176-14, C. P., as amended by Act No. 79, 1876, p. 123.

Our answer is: Xes.

Act No. 79 provides, among other things: The sheriff or constable cannot seize money due for laborer’s wages.

A laborer has been held, by various courts, in a restricted sense, to be one who performs manual labor, menial or physical exertion, labor, or toil, not requiring special accuracy, knowledge, skill or training, for hire or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Schroeder v. CollinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1904
  2. State ex rel. I. X. L. Grocery Co. v. LandSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1902

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Parish Council of Parish of East Baton Rouge v. Louisiana Highway & Heavy Branch of Associated General Contractors, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
  2. Dodd v. HoranLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Groves & Rosenblath v. AtkinsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1926
  4. Board of Barber Examiners v. ParkerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API