Legal Opinion

United States v. Moore

District Court, D. Kentucky

Decided October 3, 1900PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Prosecution for an Offense against the Postal Laws. On demurrer to indictment.

1Opinion of the Court

EVANS, District Judge.

The demurrer to the indictment in this case demands a construction of section 3893 of the Eevised Statutes, which declares to be unmailable, and which imposes a penalty for knowingly mailing, “every obscene, lewd, or lascivious book or paper.” There might be some doubt as to the meaning and intent of congress in this legislation if the supreme court had not defined it in very clear, though possibly in very narrow, terms in the case of Swearingen v. U. S., 161 U. S. 448, 16 Sup. Ct. 562, 40 L. Ed. 765. After holding that the word “or,” first occurring in the sentence…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dunlop v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. Swearingen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. United States v. Lyle B. Snider, United States of America v. Lyle B. Snider, and Sue T. SniderCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
  2. Doss v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929
  3. Wilburn S. Bruce v. First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Conroe, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
  4. Knowles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1909
  5. State v. MaurerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API