Baldwin v. Tinker
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRichard J. Cardamone, J.
The plaintiff has moved for an order vacating the defendant’s demand for a bill of particulars. The defendant has cross-moved for an order to preclude.
This motion arises during the pendency of a motor vehicle personal injury action for injuries which the plaintiff allegedly sustained on June 25, 1964. A summons and complaint were served on June 24, 1965. On July 9, 1965, the defendant made a demand for a bill of particulars. The defendant has moved to preclude the plaintiff on the grounds that the bill of particulars purporting to be in response to defendant’s demand was deficient in the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Desimone v. RobertsonNew York Supreme Court · 1959
- Mioducki v. BechtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
- Sakolish v. LilgaNew York Supreme Court · 1960
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gamliali v. Tower of DavidCivil Court of the City of New York · 1978
- Blake v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1987