United States Express Co. v. Friedman
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Ill Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Arkansas. Action for mandamus on relation of Lewis Eriedman and Hiram Mincer, partners as Eriedman & Co., against the United States Express Company. Judgment (180 Fed. 1006) granting the writ, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Circuit Judge.
This is an action. of mandamus. The relators, Lewis Friedman and Hiram Mincer, partners as Friedman & Co., are in business as dealers in intoxicating liquors at Ft. Smith, Ark. For convenience that part of Oklahoma formerly known as Indian Territory will be called by the latter name to distinguish it from the balance of that state. The United States Express Company is doing a regular express business from Ft. Smith, Ark., to points in Indian Territory over-the lines of the St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad and the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railroad. Relators'…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Leisy v. HardinSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Lone Wolf v. HitchcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Ex Parte Crow DogSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
- In Re RahrerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Lottery CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Indian Country, U.S.A., Inc. v. Oklahoma ex rel. Oklahoma Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- State v. United States Express Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1914
- First Nat. Bank of Anamoose v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
- Chambliss v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1914
- Evans v. VictorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.