Legal Opinion

San Vicente Camalu SPR De Ri v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided April 18, 2005No. Court 03-00517; SLIP OP. 05-50PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RIDGWAY, Judge.

Plaintiffs in this action — hereinafter collectively referred to as “SVC” — are San Vicente Camalu SPR de RI (“San Vicente”), a Mexican producer and exporter of fresh tomatoes, and Expo Fresh, LLC (“Expo Fresh”), a U.S. importer of the same. SVC here contests certain determinations made in the course of an anti-dumping investigation by the U.S. Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) and the U.S. International Trade Commission (“ITC”). Specifically, invoking the court’s residual jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1581(i) (2000), 1 SVC challenges the two agencies’ determinations…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. John G. Rocovich, Jr. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  3. Norcal/Crosetti Foods, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  4. Jcm, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
  5. Asociacion Colombiana De Exportadores De Flores v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. San Vicente Camalu Spr De Ri v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API