Legal Opinion · Dissent

Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided May 1, 1973No. Nos. 341, 381, Dockets 72-1521, 30934Published

1DissentHays, Circuit Judge

I believe that this case should be reconsidered en bane.

OAKES, Circuit Judge (dissenting from the denial of rehearing en banc), with whom TIMBERS, Circuit Judge, concurs:

For this court not to hear a matter of this significance is to render the en banc statute 1 a nullity. One may in this era of burgeoning appellate business quite plausibly take the view that the en banc procedure should not be used “merely” to correct individual injustices2 or mis*1022takes, but only in a case where the panel decision 3 is in serious conflict with prior decisions of the particular Circuit Court of Appeals or where…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Hansberry v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. New York Times Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  4. Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,959 Frank Lanza, Jr. v. Drexel & Co., Theodore J. Kircher and Christie F. VitoloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API