Bowman v. State

ZIMMERMANN, Justice.

Jeffery Donnell Bowman appeals his conviction for murder. The trial court assessed punishment at forty-five years confinement. Bowman contends that the trial court erred in (1) holding the evidence sufficient to sustain the conviction, and (2) admitting into evidence an unusually large amount of prejudicial hearsay evidence. We disagree. Consequently, we affirm.

1. CORROBORATED ACCOMPLICE TESTIMONY

In his first point of error, Bowman argues that the testimony of the state’s accomplice witness was not corroborated, and therefore the evidence is insufficient to support the…