Legal Opinion

Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Baltimore City v. West

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided May 11, 1934No. 2240PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Findings of Fact.

The above-entitled ease paving come on to be heard on the pleadings, on the application of the plaintiff for a preliminary injunction (and the parties having stipulated that on the evidence to be produced there should also be a final decree on the merits) and the parties having appeared by their respective counsel and offered evidence in support of their respective contentions; the Court having heard arguments and being advised in the premises now finds as the findings of fact:

1. The fair value of all the plaintiff’s property, including working capital, cash capital,…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Smyth v. AmesSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  2. The Minnesota Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Smyth v. Ames; Smyth v. Smith; Smyth v. HigginsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Los Angeles Gas & Electric Corp. v. Railroad CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1933

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. West v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. West v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API