Legal Opinion

Maples v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1978Published

1Opinion of the Court

565 S.W.2d 202 (1978)

Ben Richard MAPLES, Petitioner,

v.

STATE of Tennessee, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Tennessee.

April 24, 1978.

Jerry K. Galyon, Sevierville, for petitioner.

Brooks McLemore, Jr., Atty. Gen., Henry E. Hildebrand, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., Nashville, Al Schmutzer, Jr., Dist. Atty. Gen., Sevierville, for respondent.

OPINION

HARBISON, Justice.

Petitioner was fined for contempt as the result of admittedly fraudulent divorce proceedings which he instituted in a chancery court and in which he gave false testimony. Subsequently he was convicted of the statutory offense of perjury for that…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Ex Parte HudgingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  4. In Re MichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. State v. BlackTennessee Supreme Court · 1975

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API