Legal Opinion

Greenup v. Rodman

California Supreme Court

Decided November 13, 1986No. L.A. 32093Published

1Opinion of the Court

42 Cal.3d 822 (1986)

726 P.2d 1295

231 Cal. Rptr. 220

EILEEN GREENUP, Plaintiff and Respondent,

v.

DALE W. RODMAN et al., Defendants and Appellants.

Docket No. L.A. 32093.

Supreme Court of California.

November 13, 1986.

COUNSEL

Maureen Doyle, Horvitz & Levy, Ellis J. Horvitz and S. Thomas Todd for Defendants and Appellants.

Moore & Myers, John C. Moore and Loring M. Myers for Plaintiff and Respondent.

OPINION

MOSK, J.

As a sanction for wilful and deliberate refusal to obey discovery orders, the trial court in this case struck the answer and entered a default judgment in an amount exceeding the prayer of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Hughes Tool Co. v. Trans World Airlines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Howard R. Hughes, and Hughes Tool Company and Raymond M. HollidayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
  3. Verone Marin Fehlhaber, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. Robert F. Fehlhaber, Defendant-Appellant-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  4. Greenup v. RodmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Becker v. S.P v. Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1980

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API