Legal Opinion
Provident Life and Accident Ins Co v. McKinney
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided February 7, 2022No. 3:19-cv-01325Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF CONNECTICUT PROVIDENT LIFE & ACCIDENT INS. ) 3:19-CV-1325 (SVN) CO., ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) BRADLEY D. MCKINNEY, ) February 7, 2022 Defendant. ) RULING ON MOTION TO SUPPLEMENT ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD Sarala V. Nagala, United States District Judge. Provident Life and Accident Insurance Company (hereafter “Provident Life”) brings this action under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”),
29 U.S.C. § 1001
et seq. Specifically, Provident Life seeks a declaration that the insurance policy it issued to Bradley D. McKinney was properly rescinded,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Goldie Miller, as of the Estate of Sarah M. Potok v. United Welfare FundCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Max W. Perry v. Simplicity Engineering, a Division of Lukens General Industries, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Susan Defelice v. American International Life Assurance Company of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Halo v. Yale Health Plan, Director of Benefits & Records Yale UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2016
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.