Legal Opinion
Flenaugh v. Cash App
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided December 6, 2023No. 3:23-cv-05474Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT TACOMA 7 TIFFANY JAMIL FLENAUGH, Case No. 3:23-cv-05474-TMC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S 9 MOTION TO DISMISS v. 10 BLOCK INC, 11 Defendant. 12 13 14 Before the court is Defendant Block, Inc.’s (“Block’s”) motion to dismiss pro se Plaintiff 15 Tiffany Flenaugh’s first amended complaint. Dkt. 26. Because Ms. Flenaugh has not shown that 16 the amount in controversy is enough for this Court to have jurisdiction over her claims, the Court 17 must dismiss her complaint. In doing so, the Court expresses no opinion…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Safe Air for Everyone v. MeyerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Javiad Akhtar v. J. MesaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Washington State Physicians Insurance Exchange & Ass'n v. Fisons Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
- Gail Crum v. Circus Circus Enterprises Circus Circus Casinos, Inc. Circus Circus Hotel CasinoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.