Legal Opinion

Scott v. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 5, 1969No. 119, September Term, 1968PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOrth, J.

The applicant attacked by his first petition under the Uniform Post Conviction Procedure Act his convictions of daytime housebreaking and grand larceny at a court trial in the Criminal Court of Baltimore, receiving on each a 10 year sentence, the sentences to run concurrently. Upon hearing in the Criminal Court of Baltimore the relief sought was denied. He seeks leave to appeal requesting review on only two questions:

1) whether his trial was “fundamentally fairand

2) whether due process was violated when the State’s witnesses were not sequestered at the time evidence was received on the issue…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Swift v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  2. Nadolski v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  3. Slater v. Warden of the Maryland PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  4. Nixon v. Director, Patuxent InstitutionCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  5. Norris v. WardenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rhodes v. WardenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1969
  2. Pinkney v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1971
  3. Wilson v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  4. Payne v. WardenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API