Legal Opinion

Malanga v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1983PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Andrew V. Siracuse, J.

By order dated May 6,1982 the undersigned granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment of all causes of action in the plaintiff’s complaint. Plaintiff has brought this motion for renewal based on the legislative amendment of CPL 170.55 by addition of a new subdivision 6 effective June 1,1982 (L 1982, ch 134, § 1) and the retroactive application of this legislative change to a false arrest and imprisonment case by New York County Supreme Court Justice Grossman in Goodman v Bass (NYLJ, Nov. 8, 1982, p 14, col 2). The defendant’s request for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Broughton v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
  2. Cardi v. Supermarket General Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1978
  3. Fair v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  4. Blumenfeld v. HarrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
  5. Hollender v. Trump Village Cooperative, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Lancaster v. KindorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API