Legal Opinion

Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. v. Sevcik

Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District

Decided April 13, 2006No. 13-03-00407-CVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Memorandum Opinion by

Justice HINOJOSA.

Appellees, Michael L. Sevcik and Cathy S. Loth, sued appellants, Reliance Steel & Aluminum Company and Samuel Alvarado, 1 for damages resulting from an automobile accident. Following a jury trial, the trial court signed a judgment in favor of appellees in the amount of $3,020,000. In four issues, appellants contend (1) the evidence is legally and factually insufficient to support the jury’s findings that Cathy Loth sustained damages for (a) past and future medical care, (b) future loss of earning capacity, and (c) future pain and mental…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Cain v. BainTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. HavnerTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp. v. MaloneTexas Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Plas-Tex, Inc. v. U.S. Steel Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1989

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reliance Steel & Aluminum Co. v. SevcikTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. the City of Brownsville v. Julio Cesar Ahumada, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API