Legal Opinion
Claim of Virtuoso v. Chevrolet
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 14, 2002PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.
Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed January 11, 2001, which ruled that claimant was not entitled to an award of reduced earnings for the period beginning August 7, 1996.
After sustaining a work-related injury to his back, claimant returned to work for the employer as a used car manager with no lost time. His employment ended several months later as the result of a disagreement with the employer and, upon certifying that he was available for work, he received unemployment insurance benefits until they were exhausted. Although he initially denied working for anyone…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Claim of Benesch v. Utilities Mutual InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Claim of Holman v. Hyde Park Nursing HomeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Claim of Scotchmer v. Dresser Rand Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Claim of Fisher v. Combined Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Claim of Hambly v. Big V SupermarketsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by3 opinions
- Claim of Turetzky-Santaniello v. Vassar Bros. HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Claim of Virtuoso v. Glen Campbell Chevrolet, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Claim of Friedman v. New York City Department of TransportationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010