Breckenridge v. Bullitt's Ex'rs
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
0ferror a ¿term of;the-SMhy clTcmt murti Statement <{h& ease. of
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion op the Court.
Samuel Caurchill became indebted to Alexander' S. Bullitt, for moneys collected by Churchill belonging to the estate of Eliza Prather, of whom Bullitt was guardian. To secure this money, Churchill executed bis note with personal security. Afterwards, Gwath-mey being indebted to Churchill a sum of money due by anote or notes, Churchill induced Gwathmey to execute his note to Bullitt^ with Breckenridge, the plaintiff in error, as security; which note, Bullitt accepted in discharge of Churchill’s note, and gave it up to. Churchill,, and Churchill gave up to Gwathmey his…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Simons v. Douglas' Extr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
- Hurst v. Bank of CommerceCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928