Legal Opinion

McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. Slover

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 22, 1891No. 6955PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from Wise County.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Davidson, J.

§ 236. Failure of consideration; non est factum; pleas in nature of must be sworn to; cannot be urged for first time in county court on appeal. Suit was instituted by the appellant against the appellee in justice’s court upon the following written instrument: “ Boon-ville, Texas, May 19th, ’86. Wm. Chenowith — Sir: In regard to the Woodale reaper. I will keep the reaper, and will pay all on it I agreed to pay, which is $120. I will not go back on a fair trade on account of the weather. I want you to come Monday and set it up for me. Yours respectfully, I. S. Slover.”…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. TisdaleTexas Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Slover v. McCormick Harvesting MacHine Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API