Legal Opinion

United States v. Hughes

District Court, W.D. Arkansas

Decided February 21, 1991No. Crim. 90-20026-03PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

H. FRANKLIN WATERS, Chief Judge.

On October 30, 1990, defendant, Kenneth Doyle Hughes, was convicted by a jury of aiding and abetting in the manufacture of amphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2. Defendant Hughes moved for a judgment of acquittal at the close of the government’s case on the basis that the evidence was insufficient to sustain a conviction of the offense. At that time the court stated:

[I]m going to look at it again, if I need to, at the end of the evidence, but the court believes that there is a bare jury question made on Count 2.…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Roadway Express, Inc. v. PiperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Cooke v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. United States v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. United States v. GaddisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Darryl Lee DavisCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  2. Pueblo v. Vargas De JesúsSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1998
  3. Carlisle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Carlisle v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. El Pueblo De Puerto Rico v. Angel L. Vargas De JesusSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API