Legal Opinion

Bayreuther v. Reinisch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 8, 1942PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDore, J.

The issue on this appeal is whether an oral agreement irrevocably designating plaintiff sole beneficiary of an employee’s interest at his death in the New York City Employees’ Retirement Fund is enforcible against beneficiaries designated in writing by the employee. Plaintiff, alleged oral designee, is not related by blood or marriage to the deceased employee. Defendants, the beneficiaries designated in writing, are the employee’s brother and sister-in-law.

The first cause of action alleges that prior to September 1, 1938, plaintiff at the request of Richard A. Reinisch, the employee, rendered…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wahl v. . BarnumNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  2. Wiley v. . Solvay Process Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Tyler v. WindelsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
  4. In Re the Probate of the Alleged Will of WhitneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  5. Tyler v. . WindelsNew York Court of Appeals · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Latham v. Father DivineNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Oursler v. ArmstrongNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. Katzman v. Ætna Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. O'KEEFFE v. BryDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1978
  5. Mohawk Airlines, Inc. v. PeachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API