Legal Opinion

Martin v. Kentfield School District

California Supreme Court

Decided December 29, 1983No. S.F. 24493Published

1Opinion of the Court

35 Cal.3d 294 (1983)

673 P.2d 240

197 Cal. Rptr. 570

JANET MARTIN, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

KENTFIELD SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant and Respondent.

Docket No. S.F. 24493.

Supreme Court of California.

December 29, 1983.

COUNSEL

Peter Thomas Galiano for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Diane Ross, Raymond L. Hansen, Kirsten L. Zerger and Ramon E. Romero as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiff and Appellant.

Richard V. Godino, Sandra Woliver, Celia Ruiz, Breon, Galgani, Godino & O'Donnell, Douglas J. Maloney, County Counsel, and Ruth W. Rosen, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

BIRD, C.J.

Educa…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Adcock v. Board of EducationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Thompson v. Modesto City High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Krausen v. Solano County Junior College DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  5. King v. Berkeley Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API