Legal Opinion

Adams v. Illinois Insurance Guaranty Fund

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided June 11, 1980No. 79-319PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Simon

The issue in this declaratory judgment action is whether the defendant Illinois Insurance Guaranty Fund (the Fund) must guarantee payment of claims against surplus line insurers. It need not.

Most insurance in this State is written by insurers authorized and licensed to do business here. Such companies are extensively supervised and regulated. The law recognizes, however, that some people want insurance that they are unable to obtain from these companies. Certain insurance brokers and agents are therefore licensed to procure policies from companies not authorized to do business in this State,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Totten v. State Board of ElectionsIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Osborne v. EdisonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hardin, Rodriguez & Boivin Anesthesiologists, Ltd. v. Paradigm Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
  2. Urban v. LohamAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  3. Norberg v. Centex Homes Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  4. Claudy v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1993
  5. Miss. Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. Harkins & Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API