Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Puntari

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 13, 1962No. Appeal, 289PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Flood, J.,

The defendant, having been convicted upon a charge of armed robbery, has appealed upon the ground that he was deprived of effective representation by counsel of his choice. Carl Blanehfield, Esquire, was appointed to represent him at least as early as November 22, 1960. He refused to accept the appointed counsel and made several unsuccessful attempts to engage counsel. He secured two continuances for this purpose upon the application of Mr. Blanehfield, delaying the trial from November 22,1960, when it was first called, until January 10, 1961. When the case was called for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Segurola v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Bechler v. OlivaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Commonwealth v. ClarkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. United States v. HerskovitzCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GrantSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Stoner v. MyersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  3. Commonwealth v. DaltonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
  4. United States Ex Rel. Puntari v. MaroneyDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
  5. Commonwealth v. NealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API