Legal Opinion

Cook v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided April 18, 1927PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Appellant was indicted for making mash suitable for the distillation of alcoholic liquors, was convicted, and has appealed. For the reversal of the judgment, it is insisted that the testimony is not legally sufficient to support the verdict, and we have concluded that this assignment of error is well taken.

The testimony, stated in the light most favorable to the State, is as follows: Witnesses Cowan, Smith and Ray searched appellant’s premises, and they fonnd a barrel buried in the ground behind a log. The barrel was covered with a tow-sack and some leaves, and was about two-thirds full of a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. France v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1900
  2. Reed v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  3. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
  4. Hogan v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1926

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1930
  2. Yeager v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API