Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fallon County Ex Rel. Board of Commissioners v. State, Department of Revenue

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 2009No. DA 09-0270Published

1DissentJustice Rice

¶24 The Department of Revenue (DOR) has promulgated rules to *355regulate the establishment of tax increment financing districts (TIFDs) by local governments. Admin. R. M. 42.19.1401 through .1412 (2008). Notwithstanding the good sense embodied within DOR’s rules, a basic principle of administrative law has been violated: an agency may not engage in rulemaking, a quasi-legislative act, unless the Legislature specifically grants the agency such authority. Bell v. Dept. of Licensing, 182 Mont. 21, 22, 594 P.2d 331, 332 (1979) (quoting Anaconda Co. v. Dept. of Revenue, 178 Mont. 254, 257, 583 P.2d…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Darby Spar, Ltd. v. Department of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Bell v. Department of LicensingMontana Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Anaconda Co. v. Department of RevenueMontana Supreme Court · 1978
  4. In Re the Proposed Disciplinary Treatment of the Occupational Veterinarian's License of PeilaMontana Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API