People v. Kuhns
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice Gilleran Johnson
I agree that the defendant’s conviction should be affirmed. I also believe that the defendant is entitled to a $5 credit for the time that he was incarcerated on July 11, 2004. However, because I believe that the majority’s analysis is flawed in its determination that the defendant is entitled to a $5 credit for less than one hour that he spent in custody on July 10, 2004, I must dissent from that portion of the majority’s opinion.
At the outset, I note that the majority incorrectly frames the issue that the defendant is raising before this court. In his reply brief, the defendant acknowledges…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In re Donald A.G.Illinois Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. HareIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- People Ex Rel. Morrison v. SielaffIllinois Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
- People v. StahrAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.