Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hushaw v. Kansas Farmers Union Royalty Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 28, 1939No. 34,012; No. 34,013; No. 34,014; No. 34,015; No. 34,016; No. 34,017Published

1DissentAlleN, J.

The statute, G. S. 1935, 79-420, provides that where “the fee to the surface of any tract” is in any person and “the right or title to any minerals” is in another person, the land and the minerals shall be separately taxed. In Gas Co. v. Neosho County, 75 Kan. 335, 89 Pac. 750, it was said that the statute the “fee to the surface” is set in opposition to “the right or title to any minerals therein.” It was said that “there must be a severance of the right to the mineral and the nonmineral portions of the land.” There only could be a severance of the minerals for taxation where there was a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kansas Natural Gas Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  2. Ritchie v. Kansas, Nebraska & Dakota Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1895
  3. Richards v. ShearerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  4. Shaffer v. Kansas Farmers Union Royalty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1937
  5. Serena v. RubinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API